Zanjan and the transformation of ownership and government and the Afshar ethnicity in ZaDr. Mohnjan

Zanjan and the transformation of ownership and government and the Afshar ethnicity in Zanjan
(conflict between the Afshar people of Zanjan and the Qajarian Khans)

The first part

of the research by: Dr. Mohammad Khalegi Moghadam
Specialization: an anthropologist of Asian peoples
and a rural sociologist

Therefore, all its inhabitants followed the 5-6 great Afshari khans of their people at the begiing, like other provinces of Iran, or they followed Afshar in 102 years after the death of Nadershah, who were the rulers of Khamsa, and on the contrary, the governors of Zandiyeh and Qajariyah, and until the time of Naser al-Din Shah and Qadar. They did not have a real ethnic organization in Zanjan and it was because of the murder of Nader Shah Afshar in 1161 AH and 1266 AH until the begiing of the reign of Naser al-Din Shah Qajar which lasted for 102 years and the local authority of Afshar rulers of Zanjan was because their lands were Their economic interests in the markets of their cities should not be coveted by other Iranian ethnic groups, nor should they be coveted by influential government groups! In addition, stay strong in cultural affairs! I will write it in my article below and my mechanism, or I will present its documents below my article, or all the villages of the province and their pastures will be owned by the Qajars! And then the plaques of many caravanserais, alleys, or mosques in Zanjan were changed, or the names of the owners of the Afshari villages were also recorded as "Qajar property", but they still had not been able to change the historical documents! Yes, until the period of Naser al-Din Shah Qajar, "all governors or rulers of Qajar" were weak, or the governors of the three Qajar kings over the Khamsa of Zanjan, Bahir, Qidar, Tarem, and Mahashan, and they still did not have much power in Zanjan province! And the Afshari artisans of Zanjan province came out or it was converted for the benefit of Qajar traders, managers and employees! In addition, their Afshari clerics also died and were removed, which were about 400 clerics or were massacred in the aforementioned incident, such as the disciples of Mullah Muhammad Ali Zanjani, who were all killed, or Mullah Qurban Ali, who was later exiled to Iraq, and on the contrary, clerics affiliated with Qajar and influenced or in They gained more power in the province of Qajar and because of it, they became the owners of a number of usurped properties in Zanjan villages, which are mentioned in the following documents, in order to strengthen the political hegemony of the Qajar rulers with their mosque propaganda! Or will they be able to give religious legitimacy to the unruly people of Afshari and the Qajar orders? The Qajar agent and manager was appointed in Zanjan, and therefore they ignore the historical and religious events of the city of Zanjan or its villages! And let it be installed on the door of all the mosques of Zanjan and "built in the Qajar era" and find a culture that is against the text of Ayah al-Baqat Salihat, or the name of the old taverns or the name of the bridges, baths, and traditional water reservoirs of the city should be changed, all of which were built by Muslim benefactors. The Seljuk Turkish government, Qaraqvinlu, Vaq Qvinlu and Afshariyeh were Turks! But after the destruction of Zanjan by Naser al-Din Shah Qajar or by the soldiers of his 20th military expedition with the help of the Qajar Culture and Endowment Department, Zanjan and all of them were changed or the historical ethnicity of Zanjan was removed physically and culturally, and in the end it was all named Qajar caravanserai or Qajar baths or water Warehouses and mosques built in the Qajar era and named! Or the names of the Qajar owners of the villages of Zanjan and from the same letters, it is clear that several tax auditors and documents mentioned them, or it was also written in the Qajar Court of Appeal, and in addition, there were government officials affiliated with the Qajar government, so all of them and the names of all the owners of the villages of Zanjan are mentioned in the documents. have they all been registered under the name of "Qajar owners" and the Ministry of Finance of the Qajar era, and have they been registered? Or in the reports of other important tax auditors of the Qajar era, as in the memoirs of Basir al-Mulk Shibani, it is stated that the government official sent Muhammad Khan Iqbal al-Dawlah, the general minister of Khalsaat, to the city of Zanjan. Or he used to come to the villages of Zanjan province for the benefit of the Qajar people and to collect the agricultural tax from the government. I will mention them, or I will mention them in the pages and reports of the travelogues of the Qajar rulers in Zanjan, or I will mention the names of the new owners of the Qajar villages in the villages of Zanjan, and in the documented letters of 20 to 30 rulers, or even in the travelogues of the Qajar kings themselves! who was the ruler of Zanjan for a while, or have they been written in some books and memos, such as the memoirs of Ehtsham al-Sultaneh and Nizam Mafi, or in his travelogue of Farangistan, Naser al-Din Shah Qajar, who mentions the names of the owners of the villages of Zanjan of his era! Or, in his travelogue, Muzaffar al-Din Shah Qajar and Zahir al-Dawlah Qajar have written letters from the villages of Zanjan, or in the memoirs of Ehtsham al-Sultaneh, the ruler of Zanjan, or in the book Marat al-Badan Wadib al-Mulk, or in the 10-volume book Ain al-Sultaneh and Sadr al-Tavarikh, that they were historians of the Qajar era, and I I collected the documents of all of them with a lot of effort and then compiled them into a research booklet called "Qajar properties and assets in Zanjan province" and edited them so that they can be left for the future generations to judge, while before Naser al-Din Shah. And Qajar clan and people did not have any property in Zanjan! Or they didn't have villages in the geography of Zanjan! Or the Qajar people were not the inhabitants of Khumsa pastures and villages before, but they were a people who only lived in the western villages of Strabad and Aq Qala, Gorgan, and therefore they did not have ethnic pastures in Zanjan or agricultural villages in Zanjan that were owned by Khumsa villages! It is called or ignorant of all kinds of shameful contracts and disgraceful administrations! But all the old kings did not do it, or the old prime ministers or the employees or the secretaries of the 56 former governments of Iran did not do it in their "theory of government and nation"! Or they did not do it before in their financial sovereignty They had not done! And the only model was "state-building or institutionalization of the Qajar state" or for institutionalization and political legitimization of their ethnic authority in the new government of Iran and other ethnic groups, and this kind of new model of the government or its ministries were built and even managed the property under their supervision and all the properties of those peoples under the rule. to bring themselves under the domination of the personal will of their employees! Do the poor people know the truth? Or have they learned a cruel program in the organization, or have they learned that under the deceptive name of allocating the national budget and wasting all family funds, cruel or uecessary, in the bank accounts of 85 million Iranians, that the British and the new banking phenomenon have only deferred to the signature of a few employees. All the unfortunate people of Iran spend money in their bank pockets, and they were cheated, and they put their money in the closet of the house and put it in the bank account of these kind of untrustworthy employees of the Ministry of Finance, or through corrupt journalists, and this kind of culture is promoted, and the British after Iran and this kind of culture. In European societies, the economic administration of livelihoods was also popularized in other Asian societies, and this kind of stupid model of the Ministry of Economy, which is not yet discussed by the world's economic faculties, did not exist before the Qajar era, but later and became a cultural invention by the Qajar government, or the periodicals of the era. The Qajar constitutionalism was established in Iran, where they received money from the British embassy, and it became part of the social education and the habits of the people and the behavior of the new administrations, and finally it has led to the deep economic misery of the Asian peoples and the current deep poverty, and the people are forced to bear the burden of this new type of livelihood. Poor people, and most of them resort to smoking drugs to forget the world and its sorrows? Either they have been forced to smoke cigarettes and hookahs after the Qajar era, which was not the case before, or they did not smoke because of their optimal livelihood, but it became popular after the Qajar era, or they have suffered from deep depression, suicides, and new obscenities in Asia, which the Mongols in the old economy of villages and cities They didn't create it, or it wasn't in the old economy, and it all led to the name of "modern Asian capitalism", but it is still not discussed in the courses of economic faculties, and only the supply and demand balancing theory is important to some of the governors of the central banks of the colonial countries, and why Or at least for a while and be accepted by part of the population of Asia? But today, they are still unthought of, and they continue to endure, or are they given by the engineers of Google or Twitter, and they are also unthought of and given by electronics? which is due to the lack of political rationality of those Google engineers who restore such a rotten administrative system, or it is promoted as the "new electronic government", or the legitimacy of political worthiness is better than the behavior of the current village councils and city councils, which waste people's money and constantly impose taxes and charges. They take and waste a city, or they constantly prepare an oppressive city budget, and then by increasing the price of buying and selling goods, they ruin the lives of the people and get the expenses of the parasitic employees of their municipalities? have created in the society and wasteful expenses of the municipalities and put them in the pockets of Iranians, while the policy of "regional administration" It was not "old" and urban and so unjust, nor was his behavior or economic decisions, or the types of heads of old clans and the people of the cities in the countryside of Iran, nor was it cruel, or was it better than the behavior of the mayors or members of the current city council, who were of the same blood and homogenous inhabitants of those villages, and the spending was cruel and for that Didn't they make the subjects miserable? Or didn't they make it miserable for the family? What the current city council is doing, or the current corrupt employees of the organization are plaing, or the old heads of the people's guilds and the former cities, and the neighbors wall to wall were the same residents of those types of urban neighborhoods, and when he saw He did not know that his neighbor's son was unemployed, so they rushed to help him out of the sympathy of the citizens, or through his neighborliness and helped in different ways, or he helped the same poor and unemployed people of Muzboro neighborhood, and they were not like the current members of the parliament, or like the members of the council. The city or village council did not say what it has to do with me? Website because of hunger Does it pass? And because, unlike the past, none of the MPs care about the misery of the people! And in addition, in the formulation of the country's budgeting, the English advisers and since the Qajar period have taught them anti-people administrative language in order to educate the people to be special and to all kinds of poverty, and in addition, they do not know about the misery of the budget of all kinds of families, or about the problems of Iran's farms, villages and villages, and the slightest news. Don't they know what kind of behavior poverty does to people? Or what is he doing with the people in the treatment and treatment and the expensive travel expenses? Or the managers who have fake university degrees and how do they treat the people? Or what is the poverty that governs the budget of Iranian households? Or what will the ruling poverty do to housing rent and the cost of repairing buildings in thousands of Iranian urban neighborhoods? And why is the institution of parliament, which is an invention of the British, or a gift and invention of the British to the people of Asia, and it has led the people of the world to poverty, and it is known Isn't that what he is doing to the people of this big Asian continent? It is a kind of alien political theory of English that the decision-making representatives for the economy have prepared under them, or the representatives who are not of the same blood or the same race as their clients, so that they do not make cruel decisions, or none of them are neighbors or sympathizers, so that the citizens are poor. And they should solve their neighborhoods or they do not have the same thoughts or the same thoughts with the people and they do not respect the interests of any Iranian nation or tribe, and only one type: It caot be criticized and only the administrative behavior is praiseworthy, or are the media and journalists always praised, and besides, they are completely iocent in the ministry, or are they not criticizable if their change happens because of political mistakes, or maybe they are replaced and the situation of the people maybe even better? Or during the days of the Ministry of the Parliament, sometimes they give approvals and changes that the political theory of the British is to globalize the economy and "create an idol state", or in the theory of globalization, they and the "wretched Asian rulers" are all slaves without rights and only by gender. Are they "non-human slaves" who can be killed or bought and sold or enslaved? Or they have no citizenship rights, or they have no salary, or they are "lacking little welfare rights" or they are "governed people who can be bought and sold, and there are several managers in the stock exchange room, or they are in the transactions of the central bank with The decisions of how many oligarchy managers and all their properties will come out of their hands? Either they should be thrown out of their homes, or the model of a vote of confidence in the same economic minister, who belongs to him and has wronged the people, but is not afraid of being fired. This kind of consecration, consecration, and display of pharaohs by the government through the parliament is the model of the vote of confidence, the right to question, and the right to impeach the Egyptian priests. And in the case of the "pharaoh model government" or by voting to trust the minister of health who does not care about the treatment of people with fair money and cost, and the meaning of the ministry is not responsible to their own voters, which is contrary to the text of the Qur'an about the concept of representation and all of his Shariah clients and being satisfied with medicine and treatment. They are not him, or they are the only non-Sharia lawyers of the parliament, or they are fraudulent voters of their clients and are satisfied with his ministry, and therefore they vote full confidence in him, or in his administrative actions, which do not think of cheap treatment and hospitals for the treatment and treatment of clients, and therefore the administration is expensive or useless. Such as the Ministry of Health and other industries He doesn't want to, or the Ministry of Housing administration is the same, and for the people who have to pay millions of tomans for housing rent under the promise of his "God-like ministry", or none of his employees know that Iran's buildings are not habitable due to their high prices, and the people are forced to rent and for How many nights should they sleep comfortably? Or the welfare minister who does not know about the impoverishment of Iranians and people are forced to buy half a million worth of meat or expensive rice and sugar for their table meat, but the "Mongol government" did not have such a welfare minister in Ghazan Khan's government, or in Soltanieh and such a palace. There were no many floors of the Ministry of Welfare or the types of expenses of its building or the employees of Lamideh in all kinds of furniture, who all give obscenity or religious blasphemy to the unfortunate Mongols, so this type of "political theory of the government or the parliament" and "only the creation of the Qajar people" who use the property of the people and benefit They confiscated their government or their relationship with The people were just being brainwashed by television advertisements and are being given cultural propaganda by corrupt journalists who are their substitutes? Or will they become theorized by the media? Or will it happen by making the "priority of government and parliament members" sacred, so that only the people will be forced to accept their misery? And why is it different from the political institutions of the state or its past political understanding? In the past history, such illogical interactions between the government and the people, or unfair interactions between the political ruler and the condemned, did not exist in Asia, or did not exist in previous governments, or did not exist in the past 3200 years! they didn't have and for this reason they didn't like the British and them, or after the assassination of Shah Afshar and for forming a government in Iran, they didn't go to any of the big tribes, Bakhtiari, Ler, Turk, Turkmen, or Baloch, and only collected all kinds of unkindness with the people and only in existence They saw the corrupt Qajar people and destroyed the "contemporary administrative system of Iranians" with their hands, or destroyed the political works of the 27th century Iranian civilization that were created by the previous governments, and dragged the entire administrative system to the administrative and economic slush! Or kill Qajar with the help of corrupt leaders so that they can open a foothold in the soil of Asia or gain influence in Asia through their vileness! And they considered their administrative and economic culture to obey them as not harmful or just for their people and their region, or like obeying the Parthian or Sassanid government, who formed a government under their own hands with their consent and were able to have a "sustainable government" in Asia for about 800 years, or the administrative system Was their rule fair or was it accepted by all kinds of Asian tribes, so their government and none of them behaved unkindly like the "corrupt Qajar people"? Either they did not grab the ethnic lands under their hands, or they did not take their means of livelihood out of their hands, or they did not have a coercive, parliamentary and ministry-like behavior that can be studied in political science colleges, but after the government of Nadir Shah Afshar in Asia and all The old tribes of Iran were left aside, or the tribes with names and symbols in Asia were left aside and only Either their goal is to become a representative in the Qajar era parliament, or their goal is to become a minister in the ministries of the Qajar era, or their goal is to become an employee in the Qajar system, or to be in the departments of the Ministry of Interior or Foreign Affairs, or to be in the Ministry of Culture and Knowledge of the Qajar era, or in the Telegraph Ministry of the Qajar era. Was it only "financial domination" or was it only their goal to remove the agricultural properties of the unfortunate Baloch or Zanjani people from their hands, or was it for the benefit of the Qajar family, or was it to remove the properties of the Turkmen, Kurds, or Afshari people from their hands, and it was only Khanin. Should the Qajar clan be the owner of all the lands, or should they be the owners of all those types of lands and properties belonging to the tribes of other 31 provinces of Iran that they expropriate from the non-Qajar tribes? Or the politics of the development of the ugly region that all the Mongols and Tatars and the people of Asia didn't do, or that they didn't do in the "vassals and vassals" of themselves in Asia, or the Mongols and Tatars with all their barbarism, and even with the lands